See how tools have been previously used by researchers and social scientists
Classified under Case Studies (Nano, Dietary supplements, Climate change skeptics, Sustainable Homes, London 2012 stadium), Tools Applied (Debategraph), Users (Journalists, Decision-makers)
Researchers within the MACOSPOL project, but also Internet users already utilized and tested some of the the tools collected within the MACOSPOL platform. This work is still in progress and will continue even after the end of the project. The goal of this page is to collect this kind of information and make it available. Within the organisation of our Venice workshop, the crossroad here points to a new and different option: you can either freely choose to explore the already mapped controversies by clicking on the links above (following the Macospol platform classification), or you can follow the main Macospol Workpackage work by clicking on the links below:
- TEACHING CONTROVERSY MAPPING - PARIS TEAM
- CONTROVERSY RISK CARTOGRAPHY - munich team
- HOLDING AN ASSEMBLY OF STAKEHOLDERS WITH THE DEBATEGRAPH TOOL - LIEGE TEAM
- EXPLORE CONTROVERSY TIME AND SPACE - LAUSANNE TEAM
- CONTROVERSIES AND ARCHITECTURE- MANCHESTER TEAM
Related items from Macospol
Macospol Platform TutorialA tutorial for Decision-Makers and Journalists on controversy mapping and the use of the MACOSPOL platform